Search for: "Ely Lilly"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
Eli Lilly and Company 19-1061Issue: Whether, under Festo Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 998 F.2d 931, 937 (Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 9:55 pm
In three cases (stemming in one instance from a Federal Circuit opinion consolidated from two cases in the district court, by Eli Lilly & Co. against two ANDA defendants),... [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
One lot of Glucagon Emergency Kits have been recalled by Eli Lilly and Company due to a potentially dangerous loss of potency. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:21 pm
As of the writing of this post, three of the largest insulin manufacturers – Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi Aventis –have announced their intention to participate. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm
” Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly and Co [2017] UKSC 48 (Lord Kitchin JSC). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
FDA Licensure Process and U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Biden Claims 9 Super Tuesday Victories, Including Texas AP News – Steve Peoples and Will Weissert | Published: 3/4/2020 A resurgent Joe Biden scored victories from Texas to Massachusetts on Super Tuesday, revitalizing a presidential bid that was teetering on the edge of disaster just days earlier. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:02 am
The post Eli Lilly Secretly Paid Millions to Secure Favorable Verdict in Mass Shooting Lawsuit appeared first on pissd.com. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:02 am
The post Eli Lilly Secretly Paid Millions to Secure Favorable Verdict in Mass Shooting Lawsuit appeared first on pissd.com. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
Eli Lilly and Company, SCT Docket No. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Taltz is Eli Lilly's marketed anti-IL-17A/F monoclonal antibody ixekizumab. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:31 am
Eli Lilly & Co.'s factory in Indianapolis in 1862 Author Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:25 am
And Canada (Source: GM Authority) Jeremy Horwitz: Apple Seeks to Patent Machine Learning Correction of GPS Estimates (Source: The Verge) Source: USPTO Commentary and Journal Articles: Noel Courage: Patenting Coronavirus Treatments (Source: Lexology) Hristina Georgieva: Legal Protection of Video Games (Source: SSRN) Léon Dijkman: Changing Business Models: Huawei Makes a Surprising Announcement, or, The Changing Role of Patents in the Global Economy (Source: SSRN) New Job… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC v Eli Lilly… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”) of Indianapolis, Indiana, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana seeking a declaratory judgment that Lilly did not misappropriate any trade secrets of Defendant, SensorRx, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
Had the patent been valid, it would have been infringed. (3) Plausibility and SPC's The Eli Lilly v Genentech proceedings do not only relate to a (typical) patent revocation/infringement action, but also involved an issue on third-party SPC applications. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
