Search for: "English v. Stevens" Results 201 - 220 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 7:02 am by Ray Dowd
   An ad for Galerie Voemel brags of its legacy:Die Galerie Vömel, mehr als ein halbes Jahrhundert in Düsseldorf ansässig, wurde von Alex Vömel - Geschäftsführer der legendären Galerie Flechtheim - gegründet und wird heute von seinem Sohn Edwin Vömel weiter geführt.Vor einigen Jahren ist die Galerie in das alte Stadtpalais gegenüber vom Stadtmuseum in die Karlstadt umgesiedelt.Die Galerie Vömel… [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Matthew Scarola
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Gregory Bacon (Bristows)
A second point of note was the decision of the President of the Court of First Instance in the Plant-E Knowledge v Arkyme[3] case in the Local Division of The Hague, where the President allowed the defendant’s application to amend the language of proceedings from Dutch to English under Rule 323 RoP. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]