Search for: "Ex Parte Moore"
Results 201 - 220
of 362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
from Ex parte YAMAZAKIOf a rejection for lack of utility:While the Examiner emphasizes that the Specification provides noevidence of an operative embodiment therein “which can operate in theentire claimed range of ‘0.3 microns or less’” (Ans. 16-17), that is not arequirement for utility. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:27 am
from Ex parte ShenIt is well established that “[a]n intended use or purpose usually will not limit the scope of the claim because such statements usually do no more than define a context in which the invention operates. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:45 am
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:30 am
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
The Financial Officer and the Secretary of the Executive Council, respectively, are ex officio the Treasurer and the Secretary of the DFMS.What does the DFMS do? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Both are commodities with steadily falling prices, per Moore’s law, in today’s economy. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:48 am
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:05 pm
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:43 pm
IBM got reversal on an indefiniteness rejection under 112 P2, but lost on 102/103 in Ex parte Stading.Of the indefiniteness:35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
The ex-wife of former MP Chris Huhne denies perverting the course of justice and is pleading a special defence of marital coercion. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:53 am
Unnecessary to Traverse Unauthorized New Grounds of Rejection on AppealThe Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences did something fascinating in Ex Parte Yudoovsky. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
A debate around ex tempore judgments and their reporting at the UK Human Rights Blog In the Courts The Sun was successful in challenging an order in the Family Division of the High Court on 8 January 2012. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences did something fascinating in Ex Parte Yudoovsky. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Russia: A former police officer has been sentenced to 11 years in prison for his part in the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xp5RPv (Michael Maslanka) eDiscovery and Social Media: Recap from TLI Litigation Summit, Part II – http://bit.ly/QnpRA4 (Gina Rubel) eDiscovery: Resolving Issues Through a Collaborative Approach – http://bit.ly/XBIXES (Martin O’Hara) eLessons Learned: Interview with the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
Details: Ex parte Ryan, Jr. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:44 am
Div. 1997) (quoting Rosenberg ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:48 am
Today we bring you Part Two of an article authored by our partner Ms. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:32 pm
Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) modified the legislation and put back in the federal fiduciary standard for municipal advisers that ha been taken out. [read post]
