Search for: "FAILES v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 65,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “The Court found that the Inovalon proxy statement failed to adequately disclose conflicts of both financial advisors. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:45 am
The Gomez Factors In laying out the facts of the case, the higher court noted that one case in particular, Gomez v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:00 pm
” Libya is not the sole state to intervene in the South Africa v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Ms B’s argument was that WF had failed to comply with the notification requirements under s.193A Housing Act 1996, as the Court of Appeal had held was required in Norton v Haringey LBC (2022) EWCA Civ 1340. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Judge Garcia wrote the opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
