Search for: "Feldman v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague and whether a ruling to that effect would be retroactive. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Andy Dorchak
According to the Uniform Crimes Reporting Program, there were over eleven million arrests in the United States in 2009, down from over fourteen million in 2005. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Administrator
Feldman filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a “2018 Federal Circuit Court ruling [now being appealed to the Supreme Court that] rejected compensation to the plaintiff in a case in which the government took through eminent domain a privately owned airline terminal and physically demolished it. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Buckeye Institute announces that it has “filed the first significant First Amendment labor-law challenge in the Supreme Court of the United States since the landmark June 27 decision in Janus v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, “which fires a loud shot across the bow of the administrative state. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Unless It's All Politics, China And The United States Should Tone It Down - Washington DC attorney Dr. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am by Nabiha Syed
CACI International and Titan Corp., which considers whether private contractors working overseas for the military can be liable for torture committed at Abu Ghraib – the Court invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]