Search for: "Fisher v. Daniels"
Results 201 - 220
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
V. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Peter Krouse of The Plain Dealer reports on a talk by Jonathan Adler in which he discussed the same-sex marriage cases and the challenge to race-based affirmative action in public universities in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Finally, a nod in the direction of the Oxford Human Rights Hub, whose most recent piece looks at the American Supreme Court affirmative action case of Fisher v University of Texas. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm
Forbes columnist Daniel Fisher has authored an excellent preview of the three class-action-related cases set to be decided by the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:32 am
” Briefly: This blog continues its symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
” Daniel Fisher previews the upcoming Term at Forbes. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
Daniel Fisher also has coverage for Forbes. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:34 am
Judgment for defendants Counsel: For the claimant: James Abrahams For the first defendant: Anna Edwards-Stuart For the second defendant: Daniel Alexander QC, Charlotte May Solicitors: For the claimant: Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP For the first defendant: Manches LLP For the second defendant: Herbert Smith LLP LTL 6/8/2012 [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
Daniel Fisher of Forbes previews the arguments in Lozman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Patrick Ellisen and Daniel T. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
Writing at Washington Monthly, Daniel Luzer discusses Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
[James McDonald/Fisher & Phillips, HR Morning, Boston Herald, related editorial] As critics warned at the time, Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing provisions make a versatile weapon for employment plaintiffs [Daniel Schwartz] “Is Your Job Too Hard? [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Cir. 2011) 22 Fisher v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
At Forbes, Daniel Fisher opines that the fact that “[m]ore than half of the Supreme Court decisions in the most recent term have been unanimous . . . further undermin[es] the theory that the nation’s highest court is hopelessly split between a conservative majority and an embattled liberal minority. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Fisher, EN1 Bert E. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Fisher, EN1 Bert E. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Briefly: At Forbes, Daniel Fisher contends that the Court’s unanimous opinions in in Sackett and Mayo “sent strong messages to Congress to clean up murky laws that brought these cases to their doorstep in the first place. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
The Court’s cert. grant last Thursday in Fisher v. [read post]
