Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:02 am
Floyd County Bd. of Educ., 228 F.3d 622, 625-26 (6th Cir.1999). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
Floyd Abrams is a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
McGee v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
One way of putting this is whether the skilled person “would”, rather than “could”, arrive at the claimed invention without inventive effort (mirroring the EPO test of T2/83), but Lord Justice Floyd (delivering the Court of Appeal decision with which Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice David Richards agreed) stated that this dichotomy can be misleading, as it may bring in non-technical considerations that are not relevant.Furthermore,… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The present judgment therefore allowed the Supreme Court to hold that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Parvaz Akhtar [1981] QB 46 and Bibi v ECO (Dhaka) [2007] EWCA Civ 740 were wrongly decided. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
Circuit’s recent Frederick Douglass Foundation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:44 pm
" And, check it out, the first one is from Floyd Abrams:Ann Althouse's apologia for the so obviously politically crafted shifts in position on abortion by Rudolph W. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
See Banks v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:22 pm
Conflict of Laws: NJ law applied where a special state interest existedSpiros v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
"Recognizing a split in the authority from other circuits, the Court joined with the more restrictive Ninth Circuit view stated in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Back in June 2007, IPBiz noted that a response of patent practitioners to KSR v. [read post]
