Search for: "Garris v. Garris" Results 201 - 220 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Garry Norman MANN v Portugual and the United Kingdom – 360/10 [2011] ECHR 337 (1 February 2011) Gary Mann, sentenced to 2 years in Portuguese jail for football riot in 2004, loses case before ECtHR against extradition. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
Garry Norman MANN v Portugual and the United Kingdom – 360/10 [2011] ECHR 337 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment Garry Mann, a football fan who was convicted to two years in a Portuguese jail for rioting after an England match in 2004, has lost his appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against his conviction and extradition. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Garry as untimely, the Appellate Division set out the following factors as basic to individual litigating an issue initially submitted for adjudication under a grievance procedure:1. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 10:20 am by Robert Tanha
While this is a recognized exemption from Section 22, it is a narrow one since most employees, including many managers, cannot be said to only perform supervisory functions.A case in point is Bala Bay Inn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:10 am by Robert Tanha
Ivanov: The Future of Wallace Damages in Ontario Employment LawIf you have been wrongfully dismissed, contact a lawyer for advice as to your rights and entitlements.- Robert Tanha and Garry J. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:47 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Consequently, where an employee's claims and entitlements exceed the statutory maximum, recovery under the Act is nonetheless limited to the global sum of $10,000.See, for example, Frimpong v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 9:08 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Justice Dennis Power's November 23, 2010 default endorsement in Robert Day v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:28 pm by Robert Tanha
As a result, at common law, a temporary layoff without the employee's consent or acquiescence may give rise to a wrongful dismissal, irrespective of the provisions of the Employment Standards Act.In Martellacci v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 FSIS has yet to learn this valuable lesson.The July 10, 2000 edition of Food Chemical News, discussing the SB litigation, stated that:  "In a landmark court ruling in May, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas prohibited USDA from concluding that grinding plants are insanitary or that their products are adulterated based on Salmonella test results (Supreme Beef Processors Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 11:18 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Richard Warshak's counter-parental alientation programme, was at the centre of last month's controversial Ontario Superior Court decision on parental alienation in A.G.L. v. [read post]