Search for: "General Cable Co." Results 201 - 220 of 716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
Generally, my discussion of the “resistance” refers to the legal resistance, and not the courts. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on: “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later” January 25, 2018 Nadège RollandSenior Fellow, The National Bureau of Asian Research The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is generally understood as China’s plan to finance and build infrastructure projects across Eurasia. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Ad Law Defense
Time Warner Cable, 714 F.3d 739 (2d Cir. 2013). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:58 am by Jordan Brunner
Benjamin Wittes shared his thoughts about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Ct. 1996) (recognizing First Amendment right of access to divorce proceedings); accord Cable News v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:23 am by Cory Doctorow
EFF has been fighting against DRM and the laws behind it for a decade and a half, intervening in the US Broadcast Flag, the UN Broadcasting Treaty, the European DVB CPCM standard, the W3C EME standard and many other skirmishes, battles and even wars over the years. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:34 pm by Annemarie Bridy
Interestingly, Amazon—now a producer of paid programming—is Universal’s co-plaintiff against TickBox TV.) [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Toronto Life Publishing Co. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 2:30 pm by James Kachmar
Cable National Broadcasting Co., 86 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 1996) in support of its proposition that in order to plead a “reverse confusion” theory, “a plaintiff must allege that the defendant `saturated the market with advertising’ or alleged actual reverse confusion from customers. [read post]