Search for: "German v. German"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Canon lawyer Thomas Schüller described the verdict as a “watershed in German judicial history”. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
The story of how the Court upheld a mandatory pledge salute for school children in Minersville School District v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) extended this choice-of-law argument to the law of jurisdiction and held that jurisdiction clauses which could undermine the application of mandatory provisions are invalid, too, as only such a rule would safeguard the internationally mandatory scope of application of the provisions. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The Diller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
DPF v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am
German is also the second most popular language for the translation used to request unitary effect. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am
Lenovo, Optis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:57 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
V. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Richardson appeared first on German Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:53 am
In Sun Pharma v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:12 pm
., p. v). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
