Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 201 - 220 of 75,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 2:05 am by sally
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury Court of Appeal “Where, in civil proceedings in which a litigant’s rights to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied, irreducible minimum rights were required to be accorded the litigant to be given sufficient information of the evidential case against him, to enable him to give effective instructions concerning the essential allegations against him. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Link Financial Ltd v Jones [2012] EWHC 2402 (QB); [2012] WLR (D) 251 “A legal assignee of the debt due under a regulated consumer credit agreement which had given notice of the assignment to the debtor was a “creditor” within the meaning of section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and entitled to bring proceedings to recover the debt.” WLR Daily, 22nd August 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:28 am
Banks v Kingston upon Thames Royal Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1443; [2008] WLR (D) 397 “A purposive interpretation should be given to reg 8(2) of the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999 to ensure that, where a reviewing officer was minded to confirm a decision on different grounds, the applicant should be [...] [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:13 am by John Steele
Given the demise of Dewey and similar events, I'm pleased to upload this article by Kevin Rosen of Gibson Dunn, published by Beazley, about California's leading case (Jewel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
  The court also sought to deter the plaintiff from similar litigation tactics, given the plaintiff's pattern of litigation.The Sixth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:00 am
The California Supreme Court has given itself an additional 30 days to decide whether to grant review in Holdgrafer v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved although the Court indicated it would be given quickly. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:14 am by White Collar Crime Prof Blogger
The white collar crime blog, for two years (see here and here), has given the collar for the case most needing review to the case of Sholom Rubashkin. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by traceydennis
British Broadcasting Corporation and another v Sugar (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 715; [2010] WLR (D) 157 “Once it was established that information, requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, was held by the BBC as a public authority for the purposes of journalism (a word that was to be given its natural meaning), it was effectively exempt from production under the 2000 Act, even if the information was also held by the authority for other purposes. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:41 am by traceydennis
Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56; [2010] WLR (D) 332 “Positive procedural obligations inherent in the right to respect for family life required sufficient safeguards to be put in place so that a parent or other person whose family life with the child was at risk in the proceedings was given a proper opportunity to participate in the decision-making process. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:04 am by sally
Regina (Edwards and another) v Environment Agency and others [2010] UKSC 57; [2011] WLR (D) 327 “The function of costs officers was to carry out detailed assessments of costs, subject to any directions that might be given to them by the court. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:01 am
Reasonable notice is required for rent rise in wrong month Riverside Housing Association Ltd. v. [read post]