Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 201 - 220
of 67,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2019, 10:34 pm
Evans v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:14 am
The white collar crime blog, for two years (see here and here), has given the collar for the case most needing review to the case of Sholom Rubashkin. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:01 am
Judgment was reserved although the Court indicated it would be given quickly. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:00 am
B. v Joseph A. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:00 am
B. v Joseph A. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:26 pm
“Supreme Court Throws Abortion to an Unlevel State Playing Field; The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 4:41 am
An Allen charge, derived from the Supreme Court's opinion in Allen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:26 am
Correction Officer’s excessive absence may result in termination even if the result of verified or work-related injuryNYC Department of Corrections v Givens, OATH Index No. 393/09 (Dec. 29, 2008)ALJ Casey recommended termination for correction officer Vera Givens after Givens was absent from work for more than 135 days in a 14-month period in 2007 and 2008.Givens claimed that most of her absences were the result of work-related injuries, including… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:53 pm
In the case of Browder v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:52 pm
–Circuit Judge Bruce Seyla in Culhane v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:41 am
Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56; [2010] WLR (D) 332 “Positive procedural obligations inherent in the right to respect for family life required sufficient safeguards to be put in place so that a parent or other person whose family life with the child was at risk in the proceedings was given a proper opportunity to participate in the decision-making process. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
British Broadcasting Corporation and another v Sugar (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 715; [2010] WLR (D) 157 “Once it was established that information, requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, was held by the BBC as a public authority for the purposes of journalism (a word that was to be given its natural meaning), it was effectively exempt from production under the 2000 Act, even if the information was also held by the authority for other purposes. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:04 am
Regina (Edwards and another) v Environment Agency and others [2010] UKSC 57; [2011] WLR (D) 327 “The function of costs officers was to carry out detailed assessments of costs, subject to any directions that might be given to them by the court. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:48 pm
Given that the issue raised on appeal in a robbery/assault case was not relevant to the central issue at trial, i.e., the identity of the assailant, any error regarding that issue was harmless and does not require reversal of appellant’s convictions. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:54 am
Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 79; [2010] WLR (D) 40 “There was not, and need not be, an exception to the ‘without prejudice’ rule such as to permit evidence of ‘without prejudice’ communications and discussions to be given if there was a dispute about the interpretation of a written settlement agreement. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Employers in the Golden State are well aware that last year in Dynamex v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:41 am
Martinez; FCC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
He wrote that “principle and logic” would require the Court, given its decision in Lawrence, to hold that there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 May 2013, 8:10 pm
York was given a routine 15 day consent extension of time to file its Statement of Defence.By my calculation, we should see something filed on or before May 23, 2013.If this case somehow does not go well for York, there could be an enormous negative potential for the entire educational establishment in Canada.Therefore, given the public importance of this matter, I will likely have something to say about York's response in due course.HPK [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Employee terminated after refusing to sign a statement acknowledging a "verbal warning" given to her by her supervisorMatter of Rey-calderon v Commissioner of Labor, 2009 NY Slip Op 01562, Decided on March 5, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentWanda Rey-calderon, a school bus dispatcher, for the employer reported late to work and her supervisor gave her a verbal warning and a written acknowledgment of the verbal warning for her to sign. [read post]
