Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Correction "
Results 201 - 220
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
" * Police officers and correction officers are "public officers” for the purposes of §30 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm
Similarly, the Cameron v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
On the same day Jay J granted a harassment injunction to three judges in the case of Foskett v Kinsley. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:18 pm
Not necessarily the right decision; just a reasonable decision.Read the Court of Appeal's decision at: Gilmor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
He has said that he believed he legally had to correct the police commissioner’s comment that he was a person of interest. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Termination of a public officer from his or her position by operation of lawMunroe v Ponte, 2017 NY Slip Op 02041, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction [Department] summarily terminated Timothy Munroe, a New York City Correction Officer, from his position pursuant to Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) following Munroe's conviction of a misdemeanor, falsifying business records in the second… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
For an in-depth discussion on the first order, please see my two-part series on ;Lawfare (Part I ;and Part II) and my forthcoming essay in the Texas Law Review See Also, titled The 9th Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Commissioners originally were to severely limit the number of licensed weed dispensaries. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Commissioners originally were to severely limit the number of licensed weed dispensaries. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
The complaint was filed with the board of fire and police commissioners. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:15 am
Last week, the Sixth Circuit granted en banc review in Bormuth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm
The purpose of this update is to correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, to explain and comment on published Judgments of family cases and to highlight other transparency news. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
These cases are American Atheists Inc. v. [read post]
