Search for: "Green v. CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT" Results 201 - 220 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 3:54 am
According to an investigator with the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (hereinafter DOCCS), [Green] subsequently admitted that he purchased the cell phone for $500 in order to speak with his wife -- with whom he purportedly was experiencing marital problems.People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am by Howard Friedman
New Jersey Department of Corrections, 2014 N.J. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
 . abide by [state Department of Corrections] policy” in running the facility. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Copy 1 is issued to any applicable state, city or local tax department. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Nevertheless, plaintiffs are correct about this much:  If a plan or insurer fails to include HHS-required coverage in a plan—for contraception or any other required service—the government can impose extremely onerous taxes not only upon the plan and the insurer, but also upon the sponsoring employer, such as Hobby Lobby or Conestoga Wood. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. 1st District.Knowing when to concede error is vital:Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintaining frivolous defense to appealM.B., Appellant, vs. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:14 am
The court concluded that, in situations where a debtor filed the correct documents to reopen her bankruptcy and correct the error, as the debtor in Quin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In this case, the correct timing for litigation purposes would have been immediately following discovery of the loan. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Green of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador referred to the Adult Corrections Act in NLAPPE v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” If a resident of State 1 makes a purchase from a retailer in State 2, who has no connection with State 1, State 1 ought not be given the green light to compel the State 2 retailer to engage in tax collection on behalf of State 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
While their leaning on the “intersession v. intrasession” question was not obvious, the Third Circuit panel did seemvery skeptical about the correctness of the D.C. [read post]