Search for: "Harper v. U.s" Results 201 - 220 of 510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
” As expected, the proposal immediately came under fire by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist.[1] In criticizing the proposal he deployed the playbook that he uses to systematically oppose initiatives to protect creators of cultural materials;[2] namely, to deny there is any problem to be addressed, contend that even if there is problem the laws don’t need changing, and to engage in scaremongering[3], in this case, by claiming the proposal is “radical” and… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
(hereinafter Harper & Row), and Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
If apps cannot render legal services affordable, law societies will not be able to prevent, by way of UPL prosecutions, the commercial producers of legal services (LegalZoom, RocketLawyer, and LegalX, etc.) from successfully targeting the market of the general practitioner, as has been proved by their great success in the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:38 am by Joy Yusi
Kansas federal prison likely recorded 700+ lawyer-client meetings; class action is filedBrampton company must pay $60,000 in ‘moral damages’ for firing woman who was sexually harassedLawyers misappropriated millions from clients' funds but few faced criminal chargesFlorist Discriminated Against Gay Couple, Washington Supreme Court RulesApplying the Bardal FactorsUsha Ram, BC Burger King Employee Fired For Taking 50 Cents Of Food, Awarded $46K - Huffington PostOntario judge rebuked… [read post]