Search for: "Hawkins v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 pm by Larry Siems, The Torture Report
Judge Hawkins punctuates his point by citing Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
The 9th (Reinhardt with Schroeder, Pregerson, Kozinski, Hawkins, S. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia  Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:55 am by Shawn R. Dominy
In addition, Bryan Hawkins explained the issues, positions, and oral arguments in the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Mungovan, UNITED STATES: HEDGE FUND DUE DILIGENCE: A US LITIGATOR'S PERSPECTIVE, Mondaq Article ID: 48320***Jennifer L. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]