Search for: "Heard v. U. S" Results 201 - 220 of 891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the justices heard argument remotely, with live audio, in U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:33 pm by Howard Knopf
We were hoping to have heard from the Federal Court of Appeal by then on the Access Copyright v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Josh says “[u]niversities will demand more classes to be taught virtually. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:49 pm by doug
Implementation: The new act is located in a brand-new “Subchapter V” at 11 USC ss. 1181 through s. 1195. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm by Michael DelSignore
The Louisiana law at issue in this case is virtually identical to the Texas law that was struck down by the Court in Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
Protesting is how marginalized groups can demand to be heard in the face of systemic injustice. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am by Simon Lester
[v] Here, we do not seek to describe the precise modalities of the IAAA,[vi]  or explore its potential political effects. [read post]
While there have been nine cases brought so far by Our Children’s Trust, the 2015 case Juliana v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  Phrase at (one's) discretion attested from 1570s (earlier in (one's) discretion, late 14c.), from sense of "power to decide or judge, power of acting according to one's own judgment" (late 14c.). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez & Winograd, LLP v Schwitzer  2019 NY Slip Op 33275(U) November 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159991/2018 Judge: James E. d’Auguste is the latest case to be heard, and it asks the question of whether this conduct supports a Judiciary Law §487 claim. [read post]