Search for: "Howell v. Administrator" Results 201 - 220 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Bailey, 644 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio 1994) (holding that lying to a police officer in order to interfere with the officer’s attempt to apprehend defendant’s brother was obstruction of justice); Howell v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:56 pm by familoo
Listing is a judicial act NOT an administrative act. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Indeed, since the conflict goes to the core of the Agency's administrative expertise - the interpretation of its own regulations - the conflict is probably even more pronounced.In the Kemp phony-violation situation, defense counsel also needs to consider how to get the FDA on record. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Other Pryor decisions with separate opinions include Howell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:54 am
Host Denise Howell, a California lawyer and longtime blogger, tackles cutting-edge issues at the intersection of law and technology. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Howell, No. 07-1925 "An order affirming a bankruptcy court decision which capped the homestead exemption for a debtor is affirmed where a state court finding that a debtor was criminally liable for negligent homicide triggers the federal statutory cap on state homestead exemptions under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Justice Department opposed the unsealing, prompting Howell’s decision. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dmitry Karshtedt: Overlap with constitutional issues in patent: resolution of claims in administrative proceeding. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
Reported at Robert Ambrogi's Lawsites and The IllinoisTrial Practice Weblog.And now on with the rest of the submissions for this week's Blawg Review.The most highly talked about topic this past week was the Supreme Court's ruling on punitive damage awards in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Mondo Frazier (Death By 1000 Papercuts) certainly has it right: It only took 19 months of the Obama administration–aided and abetted by a Congress more intent on pushing unpopular laws than protecting the freedoms of the citizens who elected them–to spark this renewed broad interest in the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Crafted largely in secret by a handful of Trump administration officials and members of Congress, the bill was rushed through the legislative process. [read post]