Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 201 - 220
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2018, 1:59 pm
In Encino Motorcars LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Personal jurisdiction was not addressed, and it is impossible to see how the standard “minimum contacts” test under the Fifth Amendment (assuming, as many courts have held, that it is the correct standard) would be satisfied. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Both policies at issue in DNC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
The Supreme Court is to decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to strike out the claim as an abuse of process. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am
In UQ v Marclean Technologies SLU (C 300/19) which originated in Spain, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) assessed how the reference period of 30 or 90 days should be interpreted (i.e. how dismissals should be counted for the purposes of collective consultation requirements pursuant to the Directive). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 69 Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
The term, the Secretary’s “representative or agents,” encompasses each of the Department’s 240,000 employees; “[t]hey all carry out policy directives as pronounced by him. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Duncan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
The move presents a crucial test of Trump’s vow to improve relations with Russia, at a time when key policy positions in the State Department and Defense Department have yet to be filled, and the National Security Council is in disarray. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am
This is a lawsuit brought by Twitter users and the Knight Foundation against President Trump (and his social media strategist and press secretary). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 9:21 am
Leavitt, Secretary of the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
How can anyone want this to happen? [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
No reasons are given for accepting the correctness of that assessment. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
No reasons are given for accepting the correctness of that assessment. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
On July 19, 2007, DOC Secretary James M [read post]
