Search for: "I J v. State of Indiana" Results 201 - 220 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
Some of his recent projects:(i) Integration of technology (esp. automata) in society, esp. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:34 am by Susan Barranco
As Professor Boyden has pointed out, on a road trip across the States, I would accelerate into acceptance in Iowa, pump the brakes as I become civil unionized in Illinois, and screech to a halt in Indiana — where my marriage wouldn’t be recognized. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
/ Wei Zhang.Zhang, Wei, 1958-Albany : State University of New York Press, c2010.ChinaE183.8.C5 P26 2010Living with the dragon : how the American public views the rise of China / Benjamin I. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Eight states have rejected mandatory pro bono reporting (Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
” The court: “Based on her admission, I’ll adjudicate her delinquent. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW)   United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the patent… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the patent… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:26 am by Larry Ribstein
See, e.g., CTS Corp. v Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 99 (1987) (White, J., dissenting) (describing the “fundamental distinction” between transactional defenses such as the Indiana antitakeover statute and other corporate governance provisions, such as cumulative voting and staggered boards). [read post]