Search for: "IN RE I A PAUL MINOR" Results 201 - 220 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
The op-ed puts most of its effort into persuading people that this is both an unfair practice and an expensive one.* The former is based on the ramifications of detention, from its disparate impact on minorities and the poor, and the latter because we’re spending an enormous amount of money detaining people who can’t afford $1000 bail. [read post]
29 May 2017, 5:23 am by SHG
” “I’m tellin’ you, you’re speakin’ to your ancestor, all right? [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am by Amira Mikhail, Russell Spivak
John Thune (R-SD): I would be concerned anytime we're discussing sensitive subjects with the Russians, yes. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am by Amira Mikhail, Russell Spivak
John Thune (R-SD): I would be concerned anytime we're discussing sensitive subjects with the Russians, yes. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
In any event, the court relisted Peruta for the first time, which is good news for petitioners’ counsel, who include former solicitor general Paul Clement. [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
(Re)trainings of intellectuals by bureaucrats and apparatchiks have a long and ignoble history; I hope you’ll keep that history in mind as you think about this instance. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by SHG
If anyone has a clue what this means, I would love to know. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the 1975 Ontario judgment Re Brown, (1975), 9 O.R. (2d) 185 at 192 (Ont. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:23 am by Randy Barnett
In other words, many historians today adhere to the old proto-originalism based on original framers intent–the position that was tellingly criticized by such nonoriginalists as Paul Brest in the 1980s–the vision [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
I, Sec. 8, cl. 8) from the moment he put his hand to the Bible on January 20. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Rounds is a series of cases arising from a challenge to a 2005 South Dakota informed consent law that required physicians to give patients a written statement indicating that “the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being” and describing “all known medical risks of the procedure and statistically significant risk factors to which the pregnant woman would be subjected,” including “[i]ncreased risk of suicide ideation and… [read post]