Search for: "In Re: Mitchell B." Results 201 - 220 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by David Kopel
Democrats voted 30–13 in favor, with “ayes” coming from Senators such as Joe Biden, George Mitchell, John Glenn, and Al Gore.But things looked much worse in the House. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Within days, the administration said they were going to re-try Dr. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am by tekEditor
If you're not used to Lisp, it's hard to imagine how tremendously useful this is. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, Petitioners,v.YOLANDA LOPEZ, SHERYL HAMER, ELMER DEGUZMAN AND RICHARD WECKER, Respondents.No. 17-0733.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued March 12, 2019.Opinion delivered: May 17, 2019. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
That brings us to Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
P. 8019(b)(3). 1 Tagnetics appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s October 25, 2019 “Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters” (the “October 25 Order”). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Elrod first focuses on Part III-B, which established the predicate for the saving construction: In Part III-B, again joined by no other Justice, Chief Justice Roberts concluded that because the individual mandate found no constitutional footing in the Interstate Commerce or Necessary and Proper Clauses, the Supreme Court was obligated to consider the federal government's argument that, as an exercise in constitutional avoidance, the mandate could be read not as a command… [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Take all the evidence, throw it into the hopper, close your eyes, open your heart, and guess the weight. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
., and work as a licensed realtor for Re/MAX One in New MexicoVena A-dae RomeroExecutive Director, Cochiti Youth ExperiencePro Tem Judge, Karuk Tribe of CaliforniaJ.D., Arizona State University College of Law            Arizona State [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Pierre, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPWilliam Stein, Dattner ArchitectsJoseph Gontownik, Stonepost Properties, Inc.Abe Naparstek, Forest City Residential GroupEdward Zamiskie, Haley & Aldrich, Inc.Enzennio Mallozzi, Colliers InternationalRobert Yaffa, Grubb & EllisJeffrey Mitzner, First American TitleThomas Wiggin, Thomas Funding GroupDavid Cvijic, Millennium PartnersZarko Cvijic, Space ManagementStephen Nuckel, White Birch Builders, Inc.Rick Lyon, Capital One BankBill McCahill, Capital One… [read post]