Search for: "In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 201 - 220 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Davi, No. 05-20803 An order enjoining California and Florida from applying their licensing and regulatory requirements on a Texas-based real estate broker is reversed and dismissed where: 1) personal jurisdiction over California did not arise from merely having sent cease and desist orders to the Texas Real Estate Commission; and 2) personal jurisdiction over Florida did not arise from the state's contact with the Texas Attorney General's Office in order to obtain… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm by Brianne Gorod
The procedural history in Buck is complicated, and the question before the court was exceedingly technical, but the court took the opportunity the case presented to make an important statement about the role that race can play in our criminal justice system. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
We sued to stop the diversion of funds, and the lower courts ruled the spending illegal. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Holloway, No. 05-2229 Conviction for possession of ammunition by a felon is affirmed where the district court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress since the defendant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes until after he fled from officers. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But the rules on MPs’ travel could be about to change. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
With just a few weeks left before the Supreme Court’s summer recess, we’re entering the busiest phase of the year for relists. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In keeping with its faux neutrality and commitment to the rule of law, the Court’s decisions in these cases were all procedural. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
It is the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct that sets forth the state’s rules and procedures for allowing cameras in to cover judicial proceedings. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639 (second relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Benham’s article, Dirty Secrets: The First Amendment in Protective-Order Litigation, was cited in the following article: Craig Smith et al., Finding A Balance Between Securing Confidentiality and Preserving Court Transparency: A Re-Visit of Rule 76A and its Application to Unfiled Discovery, 69 SMU L. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Instead of filing a notice of appeal within the 14 days as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), Lambert filed a motion for reconsideration. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was not overcome here; but… [read post]