Search for: "In Re Appeal of General Motors Corp." Results 201 - 220 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 801 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm by David Cheifetz
Or, ask the question this way: was para. 9 of Resurfice Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Super. 2010), appeal granted, 15 A.3d 429 (Pa. 2011); Viguers v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
 If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[7] Starting with Section 388 is excellent, but the majority studiously ignored the rich commentary and case law that addresses this general duty in the context of sales of products to intermediaries. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We review a number of significant developments in Delaware corporate law, including the Court of Chancery’s clarification of directors’ oversight duties, and the Delaware General Assembly’s expansion of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law to include exculpation of officers for personal liability arising from breaches of the duty of care. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by MBettman
Motors Corp., 117 Ohio St.3d 192, 2008-Ohio-546, 883 N.E.2d 377 (A party raising an as-applied constitutional challenge must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the statute is unconstitutional when applied to an existing set of facts.) [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
The laws are made by our government and by common law precedents passed down from generation to generation from Court to Court and from Judge to Judge. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:38 am by Clay
  Capital Off-Road Pathfinders (CORP)Capital Off-Road Pathfinders (CORP), is the Dane County chapter of IMBA, an organization dedicated to building sustainable trails as well as promoting and creating environmentally responsible off road bicycling opportunities. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
” The “predominance” and “superiority” requirements, especially the “predominance” requirement, are key to the success or failure of many class actions and have generated significant debate in the federal courts. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
   Dollar General Corp. v. [read post]