Search for: "In Re CJ" Results 201 - 220 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm by Joe Consumer
OK, the statute of limitations hasn’t run out, but if we’re guilty we’ll go out of business and everyone will be worse off. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm by Joe Consumer
OK, the statute of limitations hasn’t run out, but if we’re guilty we’ll go out of business and everyone will be worse off. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am by Stephen Page
I recently delivered a seminar for Australia's CEO Challenge about the Family Violence Bill amendments to the Family Law Act.Since 1985, I have helped thousands of clients with their domestic violence issues.Here is my paper:Family Violence Bill 2011By Stephen PageHarrington Family Lawyers[1]Australia’s CEO Challenge 14 May, 2012Family Law Act AmendmentsThe Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2011 received royal assent on 7 December 2011. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
The principles in In re R were applied in Irish Press v Ingersoll [1994] 1 IR 176, [1993] ILRM 747, where Finlay CJ for a unanimous Supreme Court held that the parties had not discharged the “admittedly heavy” onus of proof to displace the constitutional commitment to open justice, and he set out the considerations a judge facing a s205(7) application must bear in mind: 1. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:36 pm by Rumpole
The second circuit then  refused to re-hear the case en banc, prompting Chief Judge Jacobs to issue a rare dissent on the denial to re-hear the case en banc.The CJ's attack on the veracity of the  plaintiffs/lawyers is startling, and the CJ's comparison of the plaintiffs to a disturbed pro se plaintiff suing the CIA for thought control is downright amusing. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:42 pm by Jeff Foust
If you’re interested in funding levels beyond the top-level accounts listed above, SpacePolicyOnline.com has a detailed fact sheet about the NASA budget that includes breakouts within the major accounts. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:38 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Congress is back, so we’re looking at a busy schedule this week. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:06 am by mrlibrarian
(Supreme Court Reports) to find the CJS (Corpus Juris Secundum) if her life depended on it. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
The first thing to note is we’ve got those 2 teams giving separate judgments again: (French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ; Gummow and Hayne JJ). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
" But we're not to clear what, if anything, happens next, since Justice Ginsburg's concurring opinion seems to account for further proceedings and what issues "may be pursued on remand. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Jeff Foust
Congress is returning from spring break this week, and at least in the Senate they’re wasting no time getting down to business. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm by Joe Consumer
As CJ&D reported back in 2009, each year, over 100,000 cardiac defibrillators are implanted in patients' hearts to monitor irregular heartbeats and if necessary, deliver a 700 volt electric shock to restore a heart to proper rhythm. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm by Joe Consumer
As CJ&D reported back in 2009, each year, over 100,000 cardiac defibrillators are implanted in patients' hearts to monitor irregular heartbeats and if necessary, deliver a 700 volt electric shock to restore a heart to proper rhythm. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Roberts, Jr., "Oral Advocacy and Re-emergence of a Supreme Court Bar," 30 Journal of Supreme Court History 68 (2005).The paper speaks of a "realistic theory":The realistic theory is that judges usually make up their mind before oral argument. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:34 am by war
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell J said the record companies’ argument was predicated on a wrong assumption. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:18 am by Eoin Daly
In in Re Article 26 and the Employment Equality Bill 1996, the Supreme Court upheld a  provision in the 1996 Bill, exempting denominational schools, virtual identical to the current s. 37 (the 1996 Bill was struck down on other grounds). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by NL
After further letters, the landlord, Mrs G, made a peaceable re-entry to the property on 5 April 2011.On 6 April, Mrs O, through IEI Solicitors, issued a Part 8 Claim and an application for an injunction for re-entry. [read post]