Search for: "In Re T."
Results 201 - 220
of 219,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Not every claimed invention will be able to be re-patented, but there will undoubtedly be some that will be able to be re-patented. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
In a comment to a post at patently-o, The Gooch writes on the subject of Director-ordered re-examinations:The Director hasn't initiated a reexaminaton in 4 or 5 years, the PTO dropped that practice when the CRU was established.Since the ill-fated Director-ordered re-exam of the Eolas patent, IPBiz has not heard much of Director-ordered re-exams.Looking at the numbers, it would appear that there weren't any between December 2007 and June 2009.See… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
In re Tobacco II Cases hasn't been out long, but its significance is already hard to deny. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:29 am
In re Mayne, 104 F.3d 1339, 1343 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:20 am
So there аre two viewpoints. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
See In re Merck & Co. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:42 am
How can you trust your student loan servicer when they don’t follow the law 61% of the time per a recent Inspector General’s Report? [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:20 am
Thus, the res judicata defense is unmistakably available to them. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:31 pm
I could see a court saying that if you're really spending every waking moment on sobriety, that doesn't mean you're ditching your kids during this period.But during this year-long period, Mother meets a guy, gets engaged, and gets pregnant. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
t’s not the $2 billion. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:02 am
Wife sought to re-open the case for new evidence of certain companies, arguing the valuation hadn’t taken into account important information. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
In its analysis, the Court of Appeals found: [T]he trial court’s ruling conflates the requirements of section 29-16-115(a) with the res ipsa loquitur requirements of section 29-26-115(c). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:06 pm
No, that doesn't help much either. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 5:44 pm
We are back with Episode 22 of the Class Re-Action Podcast. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
After all, he hasn't tweeted . . . well, you know. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
And if you’re not hot, they won’t date you anyway. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
He then filed a request for re-establishment but did not explain the grounds on which the request was based nor facts to support it.[8] [… T]he two-month period for filing a request for re-establishment of rights and for performing the omitted act expired on 5 March 2008 (R 131(4)). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
Justice Huffman doesn't say. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
What if you're living in the den? [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 6:45 pm
UPDATE: "Why don't you shut up? [read post]
