Search for: "In re: Eric F." Results 201 - 220 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm by Mark Astarita
Materia, 745 F. 2d 197 (2d Cir. 1984) The courts completely re-wrote the statute and figuratively removed the phrase "in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
About ten years ago, then-Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer allegedly (according to a court filing) said this:"F...ing Eric Schmidt is a f...ing p...y. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:10 am by Jon Hyman
The bad side effect is they’re all, like, workaholic, psychotic brilliant people. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Under the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, adopted by all of the states, donors and recipients are protected against lawsuits as long as they’re acting in good faith. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 12:31 pm by Cody Poplin
The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into the murder of American photojournalist James Foley, according to Attorney General Eric Holder. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:24 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That was the word today from Attorney General Eric Holder and Associate Attorney General Tony West. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:06 am by Jon Hyman
— from Wage & Hour Insights Six reasons why Hobby Lobby does not spell “doom” for women — from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor InsiderLabor Relations Why calling the boss a “f**king a**hole” may be protected activity — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions You Be The “Judge”: Is Swearing at Work Protected by Federal Law? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:09 am
Category: Civil Procedure     By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor    TitleIn re Toyota Motor Corp., No. 2014-113 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am by Jane Chong
CIA, 586 F.3d 171, 186 (2d Cir. 2009), statements made by unidentified sources do not constitute official disclosures). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
See In re Hogan, 559 F.2d 595, 606 (CCPA 1977) (noting that requiring such specific disclosures would 'impose an impossible burden on inventors'). . . . [read post]