Search for: "In re: L.J. & L.J"
Results 201 - 220
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2013, 3:30 pm
Behav. 445 (1999); Sunstein, Kahneman, & Schkade, Assessing Punitive Damages (with Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law), 107 Yale L.J. 2071 (1998). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:15 am
Heller & Rebecca S. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
& TECH. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
We are of the opinion that the above three decisions require to be re-considered as, in our opinion, something which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
L.J. 505, 512 (2009). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Swanson & William J. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
Res. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
Richard Posner, “Antitrust in the New Economy,” 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 925, 927 (2001). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
Richard Posner, “Antitrust in the New Economy,” 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 925, 927 (2001). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
Richard Posner, “Antitrust in the New Economy,” 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 925, 927 (2001). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
Richard Posner, “Antitrust in the New Economy,” 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 925, 927 (2001). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:44 am
In re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Celebrex Sales Practices & Prod. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Res. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
& Com. 59-83 (2012). [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
Voting and Vice: Criminal Disfranchisement and the Reconstruction Amendments by Richard Re and Christopher Re,121 YALE L.J. 1584 (2012), intervenes in ongoing debates over criminal disfranchisement and its racial implications by reasoning from the history of the Reconstruction Amendments. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:49 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm
” In re Glosser Bros., 382 Pa. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:54 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]