Search for: "In re GREEN et al." Results 201 - 220 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
Realty One Group, et al.[8], one of the defendants, Michael Nelson, posted 5 paragraphs of a Las Vegas Review-Journal article, titled “Program may level housing sale odds”, on his website. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(IP finance) The Statute of Anne: a note on the ‘original copy’ (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Practice in UK patent proceedings before the Comptroller (PatLit) SABIP seeks tenders for research into UK IP enforcement (PatLit) Santander to rebrand Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley Savings as Santander from end 2010 (IPKat) UK IPO fast tracks green patent applications (Green Patent Blog) Smelling like roses –… [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In order to maintain his power, Netanyahu needs to appease the most extreme right-wing members of his coalition, in somewhat the same way that Kevin McCarthy cannot risk alienating the likes of Marjorie Taylor Greene. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end: Chint v… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am by Don Cruse
Carlos Francisco Marroquin, et al., No. 09-0857 (docket and briefs). [read post]