Search for: "In re Kevin F."
Results 201 - 220
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2014, 4:46 pm
” Id.at *10.Held: “Because we rejected this precise argument [regarding FRE 701 and percipient witnesses] in Kevin Freeman, 498 F.3d at 904-05, the district court did not plainly err in not striking Officer Thompson’s testimony on this ground. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:26 am
If the mob is after the villain, he most probably ends up being shamed by the mob. f they're coming after the good guys for one reason or another (like if our heroes are hiding a Reluctant Monster), their best defense is Shaming the Mob or an obstacle that will force them to go one by one, raising the question of Who Will Bell the Cat? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
— from Wage & Hour Insights Six reasons why Hobby Lobby does not spell “doom” for women — from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor InsiderLabor Relations Why calling the boss a “f**king a**hole” may be protected activity — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions You Be The “Judge”: Is Swearing at Work Protected by Federal Law? [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
Kevin C. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
[1] Signatories other than me include: Janet Alexander, Stanford Law School; Stephen Burbank, Penn Law School; Kevin Clermont, Cornell Law School; John Coffee, Columbia Law School; James Cox, Duke Law School; Scott Dodson, Hastings Law School; Jonah Gelbach, Penn Law School; Alexandra Lahav, Connecticut Law School; David Marcus, University of Arizona Law School; Norman Spaulding, Stanford Law School; and Benjamin Spencer, Washington & Lee Law School. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
Other commentary focuses on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent in the case: at Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses “inconsistency about inconsistency” in the context of the Ginsburg dissent, while at Think Progress Judd Legum reports that the dissent has “already been turned into a song. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
(In re Tanner), 217 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2000). [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Everyone was required to re-apply. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC (In re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC), ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 1399418 (1st Cir. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
We’re talking 1791 here! [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
©Kevin C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Kevin C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
§522(f)(1)? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:40 pm
Kevin Hartnett, Boston.com: “Abasic principle of any library is that you return what you take out. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:06 am
Innvopak Systems PTY LTD, Opposition No. 91194148 [Opposition to registration of the mark WINEBUD for "alcoholic beverages except beers; wines and still wines and sparkling wines; beverages containing wine, namely, sparkling fruit wine and still fruit wine; ready to drink alcoholic beverages except beers," on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likely dilution of, the registered marks BUD, BUDWEISER and others for beer].March 19, 2014 - 10 AM: In re LAMB-GRS LLC, Serial No.… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Bollinger, by Rachel F. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
They have a great lineup of speakers, including F. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The Court of Appeals’ contrary analysis rests on its misreading of In re Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
Harrisongs Music, 420 F. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"] [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]
