Search for: "In re N.A." Results 201 - 220 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The recent decision In re Washington Mutual, Inc. [2] (which was followed even more recently in In re Accuride Corporation [3]) applies the disclosure requirements in Rule 2019 to members of an ad hoc group participating in a Chapter 11 case. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
The court pointed out that the case Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 6:24 am by Jason Starling
ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc., the Ohio Supreme Court rejected the Eighth Appellate District’s finding that R.C. 2745.01 did not really require deliberate intent to injure in order to establish an employer intentional tort. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Citibank, N.A., 226 F.3d 133, 139 (2d Cir. 2000). [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
Ruff… The 12th District rules in In re N.A. that where the issue of the juvenile defendant’s competency was raised, the trial court committed error, and defense counsel was ineffective, in not addressing it further… The 2nd District’s decision in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Pimpo, Opposition No. 91171962 (July 30, 2008) [not precedential] [TTABlogged here].Railrunner N.A., Inc. v. [read post]