Search for: "In re R. S. (1985)" Results 201 - 220 of 1,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm by Juan Antunez
White, 463 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1985), the 1985 Florida Supreme Court decision that has defined this area of the law in Florida ever since. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:38 pm
"Marilyn Monroe is often quoted as saying, "If you're going to be two-faced, at least make one of them pretty," the Ninth Circuit's opinion said. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:43 am by Giles Peaker
Aster were to pay the leaseholder’s legal costs of the application, and pay for the leaseholders to obtain an expert report on the necessity of complete re-asphalting. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:25 am by David Fraser
The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal in the case of Re X. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 2:12 pm by Giles Peaker
So, adopting Baroness Hale’s formulation in Re McLaughlin (2018) UKSC 48, there remained two questions. [read post]
29 May 2016, 2:08 pm
We are not built to be satisfied.We're Running The Red Queen's Race And We're Always Losing "Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  For judgment, please download: [2016] UKSC 8 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watching the hearing please visit: Supreme Court website [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  Steve’s experience in the Virginia surety bonding marketplace started in 1985 with USF&G. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
Abrams (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 610, 612–613; Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm
Burnett (In re Heirs of Hodge), 470 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Bob Eisenbach
The court’s rejection of the In re Crumbs Bake Shop case applying Section 365(n) to trademarks is not a surprise. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm by Giles Peaker
(All of the criminal penalties for not providing information in the L&TA 1985 are similarly nonsense – most notably the offence under s.25 of not providing details of the invoices behind the service charge under s.23). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:27 am by Administrator
For this last week: R. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Can., 1985-12-19), SOQUIJ AZ-86111007, J.E. 86-42, [1985] 2 R.C.S. 662. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]