Search for: "In re Roberts"
Results 201 - 220
of 15,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
While the paper was cited 1,370 times before retraction (and 2,960 times after), its 100,000 social media comments, not to mention Robert F. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:14 pm
The reasons why this is unconstitutional are spelled out in meticulous detail in a law review article by me and Professor Gary Lawson, Why Robert Mueller's Appointment Was Unlawful? [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:35 am
Justice Alito had been confirmed that same day, Chief Justice John Roberts four months earlier. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:04 am
Roberts, Time of Man 152 1965 Luther gets a little feisty after a few drinks, and he began to argue with him. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for the Brookings Institution, Nathan Donley, an environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, and Robert Bullard, a professor at Texas Southern University, explained how pesticide exposure is disproportionately impacting communities of color and low-income communities in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
[Re St. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Instead, the Roberts Court plowed forward. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Roberts. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:46 am
I have, and will always recommend Shimon & his law firm for their accountability, their desire to make you feel like you’re heard/personable, attention to detail and respectable reputation! [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Lawmakers Can’t Take Lobbyist Donations – Unless They’re Running for Congress MSN – Julia Wick, Anabel Sosa, and Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 2/24/2024 State law forbids California lobbyists from donating to the campaigns of state lawmakers. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Robert M. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:43 am
Defendant proposes to use lawyer Robert Stoll as an expert witness. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch spent a great deal of time exploring that topic during Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart’s argument for the government. [read post]
“Turning the Tables”: Many Appear to Follow the McCaskill Rule on the President’s Use of False Story
28 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Maybe he just confused to two because they’re both expensive to keep up when they get older. [read post]
