Search for: "In re Scott K." Results 201 - 220 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 6:55 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying 101: K Street goes back to school Politico – Byron Tau | Published: 5/7/2014 Two brand-new programs will offer aspiring lobbyists and K Street veterans alike a chance to learn new skills and beef up their resumes. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Paul, MN : West, c2013.KF4550.Z9 A44 2013 Consumer Law Contagious : why things catch on / Jonah Berger.Berger, Jonah.New York : Simon & Schuster, c2013.HF5415.153 .B463 2013 Contracts K : a common law approach to contracts / Tracey E. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
Conversely, autoclaving mature compost and re-introducing human pathogens allows for pathogen survival and increase. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
HONORABLE TRACY SHEEHAN, Circuit Court Judge, Hillsborough County, Respondent. 2nd District.Judges -- Disqualification -- Prohibition -- Disqualification required where, although motion was legally insufficient, judge took issue with facts alleged in motionALAN SCOTT MCPHERSON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:53 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The bare majority rejected the recommendation of the trial judge, veteran jurist K. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
  With these new changes, however, bring challenges in making sure you conduct a “new” Rule 506 offering (a/k/a Rule 506(c) offering) correctly. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm by Don Cruse
” Today’s orders list also dismissed as moot the parallel mandamus petition, IN RE CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY F/K/A PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DCP MIDSTREAM, LP F/K/A GPM GAS CORPORATION..., No. 12-0199 . [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
”  (In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation, 686 F.3d 197, 2012.) [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In another case, In re K-Dur, the 3d Cir. applied stricter antitrust scrutiny, holding that such settlements are subject to "quick look rule of reason analysis" that treats "any payment from a patent holder to a generic patent challenger who agrees to delay entry into the market as prima facie evidence of an unreasonable restraint of trade, which could be rebutted by showing that the payment (1) was for a purpose other than delayed entry or (2) offers some pro-competitive benefit."… [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Kathy K (The), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 802; Housen v. [read post]