Search for: "In re Wal*Mart Stores, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:25 am by Greg Mersol
  Even in other states, a plaintiff may prefer FLSA collective actions due to the lower standards for conditional certification and increasing difficulties in obtaining Rule 23 certification in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The cert petition in Ross (see SCOTUSblog page) raised the following issues: “(1) Whether it is consistent with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
We have recounted numerous efforts by the plaintiffs’ class action bar to “work around” the re-invigorated class certification requirements of Rule 23 in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by The Complex Litigator
  The Ninth Circuit reversed various aspects of the District Court's certification order after applying Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:21 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Chinese Daily News, Inc., 623 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2010), and remanded it “for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]