Search for: "In the Interest of KB"
Results 201 - 220
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
This is because malicious falsehood is classified as an “economic tort” designed to protect financial interests, rather than “emotional wellbeing” [4]. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The issue in question will often be a matter of considerable public interest. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
FEE-SHIFTING BY BENCH AND BAR IN TEXAS HENCEFORTH TO BE GUIDED BY THE LODESTAR Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
On 19 May 2023, Williams J struck out the claim and entered summary judgement for the defendants on the basis that every member of the representative class could not show that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy ([2023] EWHC 1169 (KB)). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
While recharacterization is typically used to convert debt into equity, here the obligations were converted into gifts, since non-profits do not have equity interests. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:40 pm
Information gathered indicated that the romaine lettuce of interest was harvested from the Salinas Valley growing region in California. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
Cusack.pdf (593.00 kb) [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
CBS v ABC Order 06 21 12.pdf (63.65 kb) [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
The Cyberleagle blog has an interesting post: “How well do you know the Online Safety Bill? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
THE LODESTAR COMES TO ALL LONE STAR STATE COURTS Last month the Texas Supreme Court handed down an important decision on attorney’s fees in a case involving a dispute over a commercial lease. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am
’” “Conflicts of Interest under Conditional Fee Agreements” — “Two recent cases reveal that conflicts of interest can arise at the settlement stage of a claim, particularly where a Conditional Fee Agreement (‘CFA’) applies. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On the same day, Heather Williams J handed down judgment in Davidoff v Hargrave [2023] EWHC 1825 (KB). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 8:18 am
The text of the invitation on the webpage is duplicated below in its entirety (emphasis added).User consultation on an amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020)DownloadText of the new provision and some explanatory remarks (PDF, 110 KB)Insertion of new Article 15a (oral proceedings by videoconference)The Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal were last revised in 2019 and the revised version (RPBA 2020) came into force on 1 January 2020. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
On 21 March 2024, Chamberlain J handed down judgement in the case of Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited [2024] EWHC 647 (KB). [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Green energy entrepreneur Dale Vince has confirmed his interest in acquiring The Observer as exclusive negotiations between its current owner, Guardian Media Group (GMG), and Tortoise Media near their end. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
There has been renewed interest on force majeure, in particular, because of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The application to lift the stay on the KB claim was declined, but was not struck out as an abuse of process. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:52 am
It held that, after the introduction of new Rule 28(2) EPC, Article 53(b) EPC was to be interpreted to exclude from patentability plants, plant material or animals, if the claimed product is exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process or if the claimed process features define an essentially biological process.In order to ensure legal certainty and to protect the legitimate interests of patent proprietors and applicants, the Enlarged Board ruled that the new… [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 10:55 am
To summarize: Noting that (a) the FCC first opened its doors in the Great Depression and (b) the last time the Act was amended, 56 kb/s by dial-up modem was the state of the art, Upton and Walden sensibly feel that it’s time to talk about an update. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:06 am
The statutory amendment clarified that people who are entitled to seek review of certain orders in juvenile proceedings or who are respondents or real parties in interest in such appellate proceedings may, for purposes of those appellate proceedings, access and copy those records to which they were previously given access by the juvenile court. [read post]
