Search for: "In the Interest of PS"
Results 201 - 220
of 612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
. - Our trading and hedging activities may create conflicts of interest with you. - Our hedging activities may affect your return on the SRNs and their market value. - The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the SRNs are uncertain, and may be adverse to a holder of the SRNs. - The Index and the Index Components (as described beginning on page PS- 15) have limited historical information. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am
However, I did find it interesting. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am
However, I did find it interesting. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:37 pm
PS This past weekend,... [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:03 am
PS: Check out other views on the Senate’s draft AUMF by Wells and Ilya Somin and emptywheel. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:13 am
For those interested, the links to my submission are available in this Bar and Bench story and in this SpicyIP post by Prashant. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 11:38 am
ps: thanks much to Shouvik and Sai Vinod for their work on the petition and for checking the current status of errors as of today. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
PS – In case you haven’t figured it out, anything you do or say in my presence can and will end up on my blog. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:19 pm
PS You can read the FOI request and response here. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
PS. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:12 am
What is most interesting to me is the relationship between parenthood and marriage, both before and after this decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 5:28 pm
” Conscious capitalism refers to a system in which a company has a triple bottom line that requires it to consider three “Ps” when making business decisions: profit, people, and the planet. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:41 pm
Karel Frielink Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner (17 June 2013) ps I launched my blog on 1 June 2005. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:05 am
And even in the absence of a DOJ conflict of interest, the relevant regulations (28 CFR 600.1) permit appointment of a Special Counsel in “extraordinary circumstances” or when “it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter. [read post]
16 May 2013, 10:53 am
(That should be an interesting (and probably classified) list. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:35 am
If you haven’t already listened to it you may find it interesting. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:35 am
If you haven’t already listened to it you may find it interesting. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Ps have to be more careful than in the past. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
ps: image from here [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
PS Some of the blame, perhaps, should lie on the shoulders of EQC’s lawyers, who are supposed to draw the court’s attention to relevant law, even if it goes against them. [read post]
