Search for: "In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of P. L." Results 201 - 220 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 6:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Advantages: allows price discrimination; risk sharing. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am by Schachtman
Moreover, the Court cannot determine as a matter of law whether such links were statistically insignificant because statistical significance is a question of fact. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:09 am by Susan Brenner
 . . .He ran the risk that whomever possessed the iPhone, whether it be Lee or someone else, would receive his messages. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am by Schachtman
Statistical significance is determined by reference to the p-value; significance testing (also called hypothesis testing) is the technique for computing p-values and determining statistical significance. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am by Schachtman
Haack’s point about aggregation of evidence is, at one level, unexceptionable. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:06 am by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
  It is not enough to understand a profit and loss statement (P&L) and ledgers, as an experienced financial consultant will be able to determine if revenues and expenses are properly booked, the method of accruing revenues and expenses (which will affect how the P&L looks), what tax obligations exist or may arise from the transaction, how the tax basis in the assets will be affected by the transaction, and a myriad of… [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:58 pm by Andrew Cross
       P&L Center – A market participant maintains a separate profit and loss statement reflecting the results of swap activity or treating swap activity as a separate profit center; or   3. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by paperstreet
This hedging risk method was also not patentable subject matter. [read post]
I have found that the interpretation of the law, rather than the law itself, is what matters most in asylum cases.[2] It matters most because it determines the outcome of a case. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
[P]rompt legislative action is necessary to clarify the law and avoid harm from injurious, subsidized goods. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by Schachtman
Recommendations for preventive health measures carry risks of harm, and these risks must provoke ethical scrutiny of the proposed monitoring. [read post]