Search for: "Interest of S.B." Results 201 - 220 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2009, 5:16 pm
The latest issue - Volume 21(1) - included contributions from Justice S.B. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
These cases held unconstitutional the state's restrictions on city residency requirements enacted by S.B. 82 in 2006. [read post]
” The burden of proof then shifted to California to show that SB 826 satisfied strict scrutiny by proving “(1) a compelling state interest, (2) that S.B. 826 is necessary and (3) that S.B. 826 is narrowly tailored. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:18 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Governor Asa Hutchinson signed a statute (S.B. 998 or Act 921) permitting courts the flexibility to enforce those portions of a non-competition agreement that are reasonable and to delete overbroad, unenforceable provisions. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:49 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
On May 19, Connecticut’s Governor added the Nutmeg state to the list, signing S.B. 426 into law, becoming effective October 1, 2015. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:36 pm
Eric Kearney (D-Cincinnati), whose name appeared on S.B. 10 as a sponsor, didn't respond to repeated phone calls and e-mails requesting an interview. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm by Josh Blackman
When acting in their adjudicatory capacity, judges are disinterested neutrals who lack a personal interest in the outcome of the controversy. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
But his national supremacy argument seemed regularly to falter, because the Justices as a group seemed much more interested in parsing just how the Arizona law would work in tandem with or, potentially, in conflict with federal policy. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am by Unknown
“For decades, Corporate America has funneled billions of dollars into elections in favor of politicians who favor their woke, social agendas—instead of American voters' interests. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:34 pm by Adam Schwartz
In essence, if everyone has the power to protect their own privacy, then special interests will have a harder time using their influence to shield themselves from accountability. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by Ernesto Falcon
A.B. 1366 would instead wash the state’s hands of trying to promote competition under the premise that monopolists have the best interest of consumers in mind. [read post]
” The DOJ stated that their requested relief, either a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, is “necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States in ensuring that its States respect the terms of the national compact,” as well as “to protect federal agencies, employees, and contractors whose lawful actions S.B. 8 purports to prohibit. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:34 pm by Joe Virene
  The amount in controversy excludes penalties, costs, expenses, prejudgment interest, and attorney fees. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:45 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Limits Definition of Employer and Excludes Managers and Supervisors Currently, the definition of "employer" in Ohio means "any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Unlike other abortion laws, S.B. 8 bars executive-branch officials— such as local prosecutors or the health department—from enforcing it directly. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
The statement of the case as presented to SCOTUS was as follows: Arizona enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (S.B. 1070) to address the illegal immigration crisis in the State. [read post]
To that end, virtually all Texas employers are within the statute’s reach.[1] Second, S.B. 45 expands liability to individuals who act “directly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm by Margaret Stock - Guest
A passing interest in resurgent federalism principles by a few Justices is not likely to halt that centuries-old trend. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am by Lyle Denniston
There was no mention of S.B. 1070 in Thursday’s opinion. [read post]