Search for: "JOHN DOES, 1-4; Correctional Officers"
Results 201 - 220
of 692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
When Does the New Law Go into Effect? [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
Quebec (Attorney General)) As the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. summarizes, there is a three-step process for determining whether speech is protected: (1) Does the activity in question have expressive content, thereby bringing it, prima facie, within the scope of s. 2 (b) protection? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
When visitors access the page now, they will realize that it does not feature a single lobbyist. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Officers pursued the driver and passenger on foot. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
The case involves claims that correctional officers are liable for disregarding two prisoners’ medical symptoms. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:13 am
The breadth of the threats proscribed by subdivision 1(4) is troubling because, for example, it would prohibit a former classmate or coworker from privately threatening to disclose to the media an elected official's embarrassing past if the official does not resign from public office. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
He refers to the M v The Home Office in which an affidavit produced by a Cabinet Minister as showing there was nothing to prevent a Cabinet Minister from producing an affidavit. 1505: Aidan O’Neill QC continues to read from the letter. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:06 pm
Capen’s report suggests the seven archetypes of the foreigner around which engagement is constructed: (1) the missionary; (2) the expert; (3) the sycophant; (4) the colonizer; (5) the expatriate; (6) the entrepreneur; and (7) the company person (or salaryman). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says that if it had wanted to avoid this Parliament could have said so. 14:56: Lord Keen QC says the majority of the Inner House fell into error in relation to this but Lord Brody was correct in his decision. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Broadcasting Co., Inc., 438 Fed Appx 587 [9th Cir 2011]Further, this case does not involve a highly technical area of expertise. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:33 pm
HARRIS: Correct. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
The doctrine has been (1) wholeheartedly adopted by presidential administrations of both parties; (2) called “spurious” by Congress and rejected by congressional representatives from both parties; (3) addressed by only a single district court, which resoundingly dismissed it in a 93-page opinion as “virtually foreclosed by the Supreme Court”; and (4) practiced as a historical matter in some fashion for a number of decades. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:30 am
Baca and nullifying his vote for failing to comply with the vote binding provision in § 1-4-304(5). [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
John Manley and Bill C-34 (37-2). [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
That does not violate campaign laws, but it is a symptom of the high stakes of the 2020 money race and a crowded field with some candidates struggling to stay alive ahead of the second round of debates. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
”[4] No such clarity exists within the mist that Cyan has created. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Slip op. at 4 (bold added). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Appeals Court Judges Send Emoluments Suit Against Trump Back to a Lower Court New York Times – Sharon LaFraniere | Published: 7/19/2019 A federal appeals court delivered a setback to a lawsuit by congressional Democrats accusing President Trump of illegally benefiting from his business interests while in office, saying a lower court judge hearing the suit had not adequately considered questions about the separation of powers between the president and… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am
” The committee will call John Wagner, Deputy Executive Assistant Commissioner, U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Indeed, even in 2012, there were some people who were subject to the mandate, but were statutorily exempt from having to pay the penalty: (1) individuals who could not afford coverage, (2) taxpayers with income below the filing threshold, (3) members of Indian tribes, (4) people with short gaps in coverage, and (5) those who have "suffered a hardship" as defined by the Secretary. [read post]
