Search for: "Jacobs v. Jacobs"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Doe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
In Jacobs Project Management Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:35 pm
” Jacobs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:12 pm
On Feb. 28, I blogged about Doe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
With its five guiding pillars, the Strategy codifies disparate cybersecurity actions across states and private industry by (i) advocating for legislation to protect national critical infrastructure; (ii) emphasizing threat actor deterrence and detection by officially declaring ransomware as a national security threat; (iii) proposing to shape market activity through government purchasing and proposed legislation; (iv) seeking public-private investment in cybersecurity resilience; and (v)… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 8:58 am
PatentsHenry Yang reported about the Interdigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:52 pm
The opinion and two concurrences in Fikes Wholesale, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:07 am
[8] Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs of January, 28th 1999, Case C-67/96 – Albany International v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds, EU:C:1999:28, paras 209-217 [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:29 pm
Jacob, Memories and Reflections about Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm
No. 11749, 1992 WL 111206, at *6, Jacobs, V.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:48 am
" The plaintiffs sued under the First Amendment, claiming this memo was retaliatory.The case is Bennett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
The oral arguments this week in Biden v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The Domestic Abuse Commissioner for England and Wales, Nicole Jacobs, filed complaints with IPSO, OFCOM and Ministers at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport about the media coverage, which she called ‘sensationalist and victim blaming’. [read post]
