Search for: "Jason S. Downs v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
On 10 March 2017, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Hourani v Thomson, [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) (heard 1-3, 6-10 and 13 February 2017). [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 2 March 2017 Warby J handed down judgment in Candy v Holyoake [2017] EWHC 373 (QB) heard 23 February 2017. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
David Lopez, step down this past December. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Judgment in the case of CG v Facebook was handed down by the Court of Appeal in Belfast on 21 December 2016. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
The auto parts and foreclosure auction probes could be winding down. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State” John D. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, William Goren breaks down last week’s oral argument in Fry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 6:04 am
The full court opinion is available here Richardson v Wal-Mart (9/9/16). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
Authored by David Kramer, Brian Witten and Jason Mollick of Wilson Sonsini. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
This was evident in the response of Jason Kee of Google and others who spoke for powerful interests, who emphasized that new technology moves very quickly and delay and retroactivity are serious concerns, even for an enterprise as powerful as Google. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm
Party Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
Labour’s list of demands include an amendment stating that there should be a presumption in favour of privacy and a higher threshold for authorities to be able to access records. [read post]
