Search for: "Jones v. District of Columbia"
Results 201 - 220
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking to compel removal of the administrative action to that forum. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:36 am
District of Columbia, 121 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
The Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, overturned the conviction. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
On a recent visit to Boston, Attorney Steve Shapiro (General Counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union) outlined matters before the Supreme Court today, or likely to arise in the coming 2012-2013 session. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm
District for the District of Columbia Judge Richard Roberts. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm
It simply failed to comply with the terms of the warrant – that a device be installed in the District of Columbia within 10 days, leading the government to argue that it wasn’t legally required to obtain one. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
District Court for the District of Columbia on charges he participated in a bribery conspiracy. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia was not immediately reached for comment this morning. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:17 am
We gladly work with other lawyers who have Maryland, Virginia or District of Columbia cases who need local or co-counsel. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
The Jones decision affirmed a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which had reversed the conspiracy conviction of drug trafficker Antoine Jones. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
Bowie had lost his First Amendment case in the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Jones’s conviction, explaining that the use of the GPS device violated his right under the Fourth Amendment to be free of “unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Although the warrant authorized the device’s installation on the undercarriage of the vehicle in Maryland within 10 days, the government installed the GPS on the 11th day and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
Facts: A search warrant was gotten in the District of Columbia in order to put a GPS tracker on a car. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:12 am
Ryan In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
Jones. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Because the Government conceded in the case that it did not comply with the warrant that it had obtained, and argued on appeal only that a warrant was not required to engage in the installation and tracking, Justice Scalia’s opinion lost little time in upholding the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (captioned below, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the reasoning on which they relied to reach that conclusion varied. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:50 am
But they fail to comply with the warrant, which issued from the District of Columbia, by attaching the GPS signal-emitter to your Jeep in Maryland. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned his conviction, saying the sheer amount of information that had been collected violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. [read post]
