Search for: "Joseph Kent" Results 201 - 220 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm by INFORRM
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger concludes that “the Supreme Court majority and the Eleventh Circuit have correctly interpreted the statute,” and that although “[t]here is surely much room for policy disagreement in this area, … those arguments should be made to Congress. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm by Samuel Bray
Some of the expository materials and notes are new, and there is one new case (Kent v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the decision comes from Dan Sullivan and others in the Tampa Bay Times; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:10 pm
Kent School District, while others have read the case to supply a broader "lewd and plainly offensive speech analysis," as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did in J.S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am by SHG
Now that Otis is nominated,** Mark Joseph Stern at Slate gives a run down of Bill Otis-isms. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:53 pm by Molly DiBianca
Joseph Kimble, “Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please”. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:15 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Key Contributors: Joyce Backus, NIH; Stephanie Dennis, NIH; Naomi Miller, NIH; Joseph Potvin, NIH; Sarena Burgess, NIH; Maxine Rockoff, Columbia University. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger “do[es] not see any plausible argument for retroactivity” in Edwards “[u]nder existing precedent. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:35 am by Lawrence Higgins
Presenters include: Kent Erickson, Bryan Stanley, and John Garretson. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Crime & Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger opines on the criminal-law implications of Thursday’s McGirt ruling. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern observes that as “Moore makes clear, the lives of intellectually disabled inmates still depend upon the balance of the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Joseph Williams at U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Gabrielle Kanter and Joseph Grosser offer a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
  Jack of Kent has a post on the case – author David Allen Green’s firm has been instructed by Ms Bercow. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (PDF 704 KB)Letter Expresses Concern That the Commission and Department Have Begun a "Troubling and Ill-Advised" Examination of Extending the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Beyond 60 Years at a Time02/27/2008 Letter to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Joseph Kelliher From Sen. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]