Search for: "Justice of the Peace Court #7"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
In a 7-2 decision, Justice Antonin Scalia said the state violated the Klan’s speech rights on religious grounds by restricting its access to a public forum. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:25 am
Justice David Doherty remarked. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm
Is this not a clear sign that the court has violated the legal principle of neutrality? [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:07 pm
(b)(7) Supervise the court administrator in the management of the court and the performance of the administrator's duties. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
The Justices pick and choose which rights they deem fundamental and which limits they place on Congress based on their own values and ideologies whether or not text supports the results.7) The Supreme Court has reversed its own cases in virtually every area of litigated constitutional law even where the text has not changed and no new historical discoveries triggered the change. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:16 pm
That determination can be made by a judge or a justice of the peace. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:09 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the Court; Justice Antonin Scalia dissented. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:29 am
When I was sworn in I was appointed to HM Commission of the Peace for Middlesex. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
It would suffice for our purpose to quote from the 7-Judge Bench decision of this Court in Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
” Slip Op. at 6-7. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 1:00 pm
(Asylum Law): Dismantling the Mythology of 'Private Violence' Undergirding Matter of A-B-," Willamette Journal of Social Justice & Equity, vol. 4, no. 2 (2021) [full-text] - Focuses on the US. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 8:01 am
Interestingly Michael Gove, whose day job is a Justice Minister opposes this. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
In re Pruitt (05-11-01526-CV) – Recites well-established rule that court of appeals does not have mandamus jurisdiction over a justice of the peace. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
" In talking about the "serene and peaceful" death, Judge Kozinski cites to a concurrence by Justice Scalia where Justice Scalia wrote "How enviable a quiet death by lethal injection. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:05 am
By the time you read this, it will be June 7, 2011. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
SJC Justice Cordy then issued an order suspending the attorney from practicing law for three years. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
John Larkin QC, Attorney General for Northern Ireland - Ulster University, Transitional Justice Institute, Seminar, Belfast https://www.ulster.ac.uk/ulster-life/events/transitional-justice-institute/challenges-to-the-rule-of-law-in-the-21st-century 5 Oct. 2016:The Annual Walsh lecture - Mr Justice Niall Fennelly, UCD, Dublin https://www.ucd.ie/law/newsandevents/events/ Thu. 6 Oct. 2016:NWCI Members and Friends Meeting - Women’s Rights and CEDAW,… [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
John Larkin QC, Attorney General for Northern Ireland - Ulster University, Transitional Justice Institute, Seminar, Belfast https://www.ulster.ac.uk/ulster-life/events/transitional-justice-institute/challenges-to-the-rule-of-law-in-the-21st-century 5 Oct. 2016:The Annual Walsh lecture - Mr Justice Niall Fennelly, UCD, Dublin https://www.ucd.ie/law/newsandevents/events/ Thu. 6 Oct. 2016:NWCI Members and Friends Meeting - Women’s Rights and CEDAW,… [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
John Larkin QC, Attorney General for Northern Ireland - Ulster University, Transitional Justice Institute, Seminar, Belfast https://www.ulster.ac.uk/ulster-life/events/transitional-justice-institute/challenges-to-the-rule-of-law-in-the-21st-century 5 Oct. 2016:The Annual Walsh lecture - Mr Justice Niall Fennelly, UCD, Dublin https://www.ucd.ie/law/newsandevents/events/ Thu. 6 Oct. 2016:NWCI Members and Friends Meeting - Women’s Rights and CEDAW,… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Id., at 7 (arguing that the Court should “attempt to construe [the] statute in a way that would render it constitutional”). [read post]
