Search for: "KEY v. LONDON"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
Notably, Mr Battistelli has apparently lost the crucial support of Mr Jesper Kongstad, the Chair of the Administrative Council, who had until now been one of Battistelli’s key defenders. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:18 am
See County of Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:18 am
Supreme Court arguments in Winter v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:46 pm
See US v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 10:48 am
See US v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 6:13 am
For me, the key thing was the statement that Mr. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am
This note summarises the key aspects of the decision, which will be of general interest to those involved in international disputes, and particularly those involved in disputes between high net worth individuals where jurisdiction is in issue. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
In Tanden v Trustees of Spurgeon Homes [1982] AC 755, it had been said that this was not an exacting test; unless no reasonable person could call the property a house, then it probably was; the key indicia were likely to be the internal and external appearance. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
In Tanden v Trustees of Spurgeon Homes [1982] AC 755, it had been said that this was not an exacting test; unless no reasonable person could call the property a house, then it probably was; the key indicia were likely to be the internal and external appearance. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Do not worry, because our dear friend and fellow blogger Alberto is back with his 76th edition of his Never Too Late feature.Here’s what happened on this very blog last week:* Book Reviews: Future Reviews and The Making of the TRIPS agreementWith Jeremy's retirement, Nicola is now the key point of contact for IPKat book reviews. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
TW, SW, and EM, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Hillingdon (2018) EWHC 1791 This was a judicial review of Hillingdon’s allocation scheme and in particular, the thresholds for eligibility for inclusion on the housing list set by Hillingdon. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
Provided for your review/use is this week's snapshot update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
