Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 201 - 220 of 1,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
  In that context, then, it does make a little sense to return, if only for an instant, to the first principles driving these conversations with potent contemporary transformative effects. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 1:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" And from Judge Pryor's conclusion: I will close by quoting from Justice Benjamin Curtis's dissent in Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am by Jennifer Davis
KF35 v. 59 Congressional Record 7455 (May 21, 1920) Draft of Hawaiian Homes Commission Act amended by George McClellan, December 1920, William E. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In 1857, the Court said Congress could not end slavery in the territories despite Congress having the express power in Article IV of the Constitution to make all rules and regulations for the territories. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
  But it is ultimately unsatisfying because it does little to advance the formal legitimacy of the claims of the state or other entity to which aid is secreted. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:20 am
Remember September 11th, a terrible day in 2001 when evil tried to turn your cities, independent territories, in battlefields. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  As I have made crystal clear the United States and our Allies will defend every inch of territory of NATO countries with the full force of our collective power. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
” (1 Feb 2022, Commons DCMS Sub-Committee on Online Harms and Disinformation) It is true that the illegality safety duty has received relatively little attention compared with the furore over the draft Bill’s ‘legal but harmful’ provisions. [read post]
While reputation only needs to be proved in a substantial part of the territory of the Union (see PAGO International, C‑301/07, paragraph 27), acquired distinctiveness must be proved throughout the entire Union (see C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17Société des produits Nestlé and Others v Mondelez UK Holdings & Services [KitKat], para. 76-78). [read post]