Search for: "Laing v. Federal Express Corp."
Results 201 - 220
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
AT&T Corp., No. 07-15845 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[17] The Reporter charitably noted that the problem could be in the infelicitous expression of some courts that short-circuit their analyses by saying “I see the problems, but they go to the weight of the evidence. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
The Federal Election Campaign Act and Buckley v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Berry, 324 So. 2d 822, 827 (La. 1976) ("by bringing the action, [a plaintiff] waives his right to claim the privilege as to any physicians who have prescribed for or treated him for such injuries"); State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Federal Laboratories Corporation et alfiled 01/10/07 1:07-cv-00273Aquascape Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Conservative commentators (see here, here, and here) have expressed support for a potential Garland nomination. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
The LLC succeeded in opening one burger restaurant at a Las Vegas casino, under a set of licensing agreements with an affiliate of Caesars Entertainment Corp., before things skidded to a halt after Seibel pled guilty to a federal tax-related felony and after Caesars, in order to maintain its compliance with Nevada gaming regulations, terminated the license agreements when Seibel refused its (and Ramsay’s) demand that… [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
The LLC succeeded in opening one burger restaurant at a Las Vegas casino, under a set of licensing agreements with an affiliate of Caesars Entertainment Corp., before things skidded to a halt after Seibel pled guilty to a federal tax-related felony and after Caesars, in order to maintain its compliance with Nevada gaming regulations, terminated the license agreements when Seibel refused its (and Ramsay’s) demand that… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Jones Act Negligence The Jones Act incorporates the provisions of the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA). 45 U.S.C.A. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Hardt v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
William Jefferson (D-La.). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here UB pays federal fine for PCB transformer problems. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 28, 20090)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of fem sales manager's dual retaliation claimsCommentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions>> 5th Cir. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
