Search for: "Larkins v. Larkins"
Results 201 - 220
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
As the BBC reports here, the Attorney General John Larkin decided not to pursue the case after Hain clarified his statements about a high court judge in his memoirs, ‘Outside In’. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
(As Larkin and I previewed the argument in some detail, I’ll assume reader familiarity with the key issues in play.) [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:08 pm
Circuit in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Kansas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
Larkin observed that having children means addition to your family, but that might not be increase of yourself – rather it is dilution. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
(Wry v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
In last week’s case (Tompkins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
L. 249-268 (2010).Larkin, J. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
United States, and Ryburn v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted online at this link the audio of yesterday's oral argument before an 11-judge en banc panel in the case captioned Lacey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
”] The first sentence is quote from Withrow v Larkin, and thus it could be seen as Roberts relying on precedent. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
The standard they adopt appears to be grounded in psychology: citing Withrow v Larkin, they state that a conflict of interest requires recusal if "under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weakness, the interest poses such a risk of acutal bias or prejudgment that the practice must be forbidden if the guaranteeof due process is to be adequately implemented. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm
See Al-Adahi v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm
Supp. 2d 51, 54-55 (D.D.C. 2009) and Judge Kollar-Kotelly in Al Mutairi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm
Larkins, 49, of Chicago, Robert E. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Michael Lacey, Jim Larkin & Phoenix New Times LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Arpaio obliged by ordering the arrest, without a warrant, of Phoenix New Times publishers Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin for violating Arizona’s grand jury secrecy laws. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Gunderson, 279 S.W.3d 93, 109-110, 112 (Ky. 2008); Larkin v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:58 am
Circuit of flouting the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
