Search for: "Lawrence Solum" Results 201 - 220 of 447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 4:17 am by Lawrence Solum
It presents the views of professor Lawrence Solum on the role of original meaning in constitutional interpretation and his fixation thesis. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm by Samir Chopra
Obviously, this symposium would not have been possible without its participants–Ken Anderson, Ryan Calo, James Grimmelmann, Sonia Katyal, Ian Kerr, Andrea Matwyshyn, Deborah DeMott, Paul Ohm,  Ugo Pagallo, Lawrence Solum, Ramesh Subramanian and Harry Surden–and I thank them all for their responses. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm by Samir Chopra
I would like to respond to a series of related posts made by Ken Anderson, Giovanni Sartor, Lawrence Solum, and James Grimmelmann during the LTAAA symposium. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction There are many different theories of constitutional interpretation, but the most controversial and also perhaps the most influential is "originalism"--actually a family of constitutional theories. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:54 am by Samir Chopra
In responding to Sonia, I think one clarification is in order (this is a general point, and is thus directed at Lawrence Solum’s remarks on zombies and legal personhood as well, though I will have more to say about that particular thought experiment a bit later). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Ugo Pagallo
In the wording of Lawrence Solum’s Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligence: “one cannot, on conceptual grounds, rule out in advance the possibility that AIs should be given the rights of constitutional personhood” (1992: 1260). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:43 am by Frank Pasquale
 Participants will include Ken Anderson, Ryan Calo, James Grimmelmann, Sonia Katyal, Ian Kerr, Andrea Matwyshyn, Deborah DeMott, Paul Ohm,  Ugo Pagallo, Lawrence Solum, Ramesh Subramanian and Harry Surden. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:14 am by christopher
In Lawrence Solum’s Legal Theory Blog, the January 15, 2012 law review article of Professor Haochen Sun, “Fair Use as a Collective Right” The article abstract provides the theory: “This Article puts forward a new theory that reconceptualizes fair use as a collective user right in copyright law. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:17 am by legalinformatics
McGinnis of the Northwestern University School of Law; and Professor Lawrence Solum of the Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Lawrence Solum
PANELISTS: • Carl Bogus, Roger Williams University School of Law • Courtney Cahill, Roger Williams University School of Law • Steven Calabresi, Northwestern University School of Law • William Forbath, University of Texas School of Law • Douglas NeJaime, Loyola Law School Los Angeles • Reva Siegel, Yale Law School • Lawrence Solum, Georgetown Law School • Ilya Somin, George Mason University School of Law • Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 (Hat tip: Lawrence Solum) Legal scholars also debated the acceptatbility of recess appointments during the Bush Administration. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:13 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The  Legal Theory Lexicon already includes posts on  Deontology and  Utilitarianism--representing two important families of ethical theory. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The post provides a very basic introduction to the idea of "second best. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This is an important article, which has already received notice from Lawrence Solum and Jack Balkin, among others. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
This is a central claim of New Originalists like Randy Barnett, Larry Solum, and myself. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction How should citizens in a modern pluralist democracy debate and discuss public affairs? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This article is Lawrence Solum’s “Download of the Week,” and with good reason, as it is sure to prompt significant discussion and debate. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction  It used to be the case that an endless investigation of the difference between holding and dictum was a central preoccupation of the first year of law school. [read post]