Search for: "Lay v. USA" Results 201 - 220 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Constitution states, “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes…. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
[Note: This post is Part V of a series on amending the BCP and adopting trial or experimental liturgies for use in the Church, as we head into General Convention LXXVII later this week. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:46 am by Eric
” The judges should reread Section 230(b), where Congress explicitly lays out its policy objectives for Section 230. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
Good lawyering is something all attorneys can appreciate, but in some instances it should be possible for lay persons to admire it as well. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:09 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Daiohs USA, Inc., supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1304-1305 [proof of common scheduling policy that made taking breaks extremely difficult would show violation]; Dilts v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
The brief is very well written, and extremely readable; I commend it both to legal and lay minds alike. [read post]